This post is mostly about what I have to say on Bellezza’s latest (and can I say provocative?) post on the topic of going back to the basics of blogging. I’d really appreciate it if you could all visit Dolce Bellezza and read her honest thoughts. There she speaks about the virtues of staying true to ourselves as we blog, as well as her opinion on certain trends that are becoming more and more widespread in the blogging community. I’ve already posted my comments there, but in light of some recent events I felt the need to talk about it in my blog as well.

But before I go into that, please also allow me to express formal apologies to those who’ve written to me in hopes of having their books or websites featured, advertised, or reviewed here in my blog—and whom for that matter I’ve respectfully declined. I sincerely hope that each reply I’ve made have been satisfactory and by all means unoffensive. It’s flattering for me to have my humble site considered for such purposes, and though I regretfully cannot be of help to you, I do wish you all success in your respective ventures.

Now on the issue of going “back to basics,” I can say that for me it’s a matter of keeping my blog my own. I feel that if I were to write a post that is practically commercial or promotional in nature, my blog would no longer be my own, or at least not in the context that I would’ve liked it to be. I have no problems, however, with writing good reviews about books that I enjoyed reading, and I’m always happy to post links to their websites so that my readers would have access to excerpts and extra material, including links to online stores should the reader be interested enough to want to buy a copy. Not that there’s anything particularly wrong about it, but what I don’t want is for my posts to be tied to a promo. For me, writing about the things that made me love a book is quite different from simply posting a clear advertorial. And though I very much cherish the blogging community, my blog is also not a social networking site. I keep separate Facebook and Goodreads accounts for that purpose :) If ever I’m followed or recognized, I hope it’s for my writing and not for anything else.

I hope I don’t come off sounding like a hypocrite, though. I do have something that might be called “ties” with a publisher, but they only send me books that I personally requested after careful consideration. And I firmly believe that I always write only the truth in what I enjoyed about a book. I guess I’m just very fortunate that so far every book I’ve asked from publishers turned out to be good, if not great. Now that I think about it, it can also be said that I sometimes mix a bit of “business” in my blogging. But it’s only in the sense that I try to be professional and courteous when communicating with publishers and authors (especially when I’m being so bold as to ask for review copies of their books) and that I feature their works when I do find them enjoyable or worth reading. But I wouldn’t go as far as agreeing to promote a book I’m totally not interested in simply because I owe a publisher for giving me other free books that I’ve requested. I know for a fact that I’ve never lied about my impression of a book just to make it sound worth buying.

Like Bellezza, when I first started my blog I had no idea that it’d soon center around books and literature. My original plan was simply to create a space where I could place my thoughts and have it safely kept so that I can go back to them again in the future. I’ve tried it with a hand-written journal the year before, but it didn’t work very well for me mostly because I can never seem to compose my thoughts in order with just one go; the ability to re-read and then re-write has been very helpful to me. So, as you see, it is my intention to keep my blog as an archive of things that have come off my head. And now that it’s become primarily a book blog, it’s my desire to keep my posts centered on my readings—a blog that more or less carries the same feel of a personal journal (or reading notes, for that matter). There are a number of such sites that I very much admire, but there’s one in particular that I can say is a near-perfect (if not at all perfect) example of my ideal book blog. It’s Emily’s blog Evening All Afternoon. Its simple style and profound writing never fails to inspire me to try and achieve a higher standard of quality for my blog, mostly for myself but also for my readers’ benefit.


Now before I end this rather long post, I’d like to apologize for my absence in the blogging community (that is in case anyone has even noticed, hehe!) As much as I hate to blog about it, my 4-month-old laptop’s down at the service center again for more parts replacement, and you can all just guess how frustrating it can be to not have a computer at home for weeks. More than anything, I really feel bad about not having posted a book review for Carl’s RIP IV Challenge. I know of course that with the huge number of participants, my review would be so far from being missed but I felt like I’ve somehow let Carl down after having promised to participate in the challenge. It’s long past the deadline, but I’ll be sure to write and post my review of Elizabeth Kostova’s The Historian as soon as I get my computer back.

10 Comments

    Suko said:

    Mark David, this is a very thoughtful post.

    Like you, I'm discerning about what I read. I try to "blog with integrity", and think that most of us do.

    What truly amazes me is the sheer number of books that some bloggers post about--are they speed readers?

    Looking forward to your post on The Historian.

     

    Mark David: thanks for the great post and for pointing out Bellezza's comments.

    Here's what I wrote on her blog:

    I am basically a frustrated journalist :) and so my blog is like a mini newspaper of books reviews, which I print without compensation, except for books I accept for review. I think bloggers do a service too for those writers who may be good but have few inexpensive ways to get their books noticed but through blogs.

    I try to write up all the books I'm sent/accept though I also don't accept everything. It's a hit and miss game. The great thing about this is that I've been reading some good books I never would have found otherwise. That's the fun part.

    And for the ego, I do check alexa. com to see how I'm doing in terms of reaching readers. Whatever and however you blog - have fun doing it! I agree with that Mark David and Bellezza!

     

    I just visited Emily's blog, and as you said, find it a site of gret integrity. She is obviously true to herself, and herself only, and that is a great gift in this "come follow me" kind of world we're living in.

    After writing what I thought was a simple post ("Hey, I Want To Focus on Books Not Numbers!") I find myself more confused than ever. I love to give books away, I love being asked to review something. I hope I'm not being duplicitous to myself when I accept a book to review, or give away something I've loved...ultimately, I want to be completely honest and real and appreciated for what I write. As I assume most of us do.

     
    Emily said:

    Wow, Mark David, thank you so much for the kind words! I completley agree with Bellezza's post and yours: I'm not about amassing a ton of followers or working my way up some kind of ladder; I just love writing about books! :-) And I'm always blown away by the thoughtful, high quality of your reviews.

    One of the things I love about blogging is that there's basically infinite room on the internet, so we can all be our own kind of book-bloggers. Cheers to you & your great blog!

     
    Mark David said:

    @Suko: Thanks Suko, you're always a sweet commenter :) Yes, I do think that many book bloggers have a talent for reading fast while still managing to absorb a lot from what they read. I'm just hoping that it's also a skill that can be developed because it'd sure save me a lot of time for other things if I could learn to read as fast as others do :)

    @Book Bird Dog: Thanks for posting your comments here Harvee! Isn't that what's nice about the blogging community? You can be a journalist if you wanted to do, just by starting your own blog and watching for it to grow :) In my case I get to be a self-appointed reviewer, as if I'm working for my own magazine. And it's really fun, isn't it? If you think about how long your blog's been running and how many people have been getting truthful information from it, you're already a real journalist by your own right Harvee :)

    @Bellezza: First of all, I'd like to congratulate and thank you for again thinking of a very interesting topic for discussion. You really seem to have a knack for it Bellezza :) I certainly don't think you're being duplicitous, because as we've all agreed over in your own blog post, the discussion isn't exactly against the hosting of giveaways or receiving free books from publishers. And as others like Harry Markov have also pointed out, page ranking in itself isn't necessarily diabolical. There can be quite good reasons behind it. As long as we're being honest and true both to ourselves and to our readers, then it's all good. And nothing makes me doubt that you always stay true :)

    @Emily: You're very welcome Emily, and thank you for your kinds words as well :) As someone who usually has a storm of thoughts going through his head in chaos, I can really appreciate the beauty of something made perfectly simple and orderly. Yes, that's a really nice way of putting it, the Internet is big enough for each of us to be our own kind of blogger. If we think about it, even if some people really are writing posts or giving free stuff only to gain popularity or recognition, then there still isn't anything particularly bad about it, right? It'd just mean that that's the purpose of their blog (something more social in nature), and if their comfortable with it then it can't be so bad that our own blogs have a different purpose (which would essentially be more personal in nature).

    It's just great that Bellezza takes the time to reflect on what she's doing with her blog and what she's accomplishing with it. It's important, I think, that we continue to do something because we actually love it and it nourishes our inner selves as much as it entertains others.

    In my case, I do love books and I've always considered writing reviews to be a fulfilling task. My blog has two main purposes. One is to make something out of my readings, to write something about them that I can always look back to, so that I wouldn't feel that my time spent in reading simply passed away without bearing a visible fruit of its own. Second is to develop and fine-tune a skill for writing. I like to think that sometime in the future when I finally get tired of my day job, I'll have enough skill, knowledge, and experience in writing and in literature such that I may find it possible to start an enjoyable career out of it. I like to dream that someday maybe it wouldn't be so far fetched for me to be an editor, a magazine contributor, or who knows maybe even an actual author :)

     
    Frances said:

    Beautifully said! And I could not agree more about Emily's blog. It is what many of us aspire to.

    I do not even know how to access some of these stat services I see referred to here and there. Love that people stop by to read and chat principally because I consider myself a book temptress of sorts. :) It is the librarian in me. Also do not give away just any books. I only accept offers for the most delicious books. And only because I care for them so much myself that I want others to have them.

    Appreciate your honesty here.

     
    Mark David said:

    Thanks for sharing your take on the matter Frances! I do know for a fact that your giveaways are always "delicious"--just one of the many reasons why I love your blog as well. And you're right about being a temptress, for I always find books in your site that easily capture my interest :)

     
    pilgrimchick said:

    I admire your staying true to yourself in this respect. From my own experience, I had a friend of mine get really upset with me about a blog post I put up about a place where we worked together at one time. I took the post down, but later, I was really upset with myself about it--it was my time, my space, and my opinion, and I should have stuck to that.

     
    Carl V. said:

    No need to apologize for the R.I.P. stuff. I'm sorry your computer is down. That is a huge pain, one I've unfortunately felt more than once in the past.

    Nice thoughts, and I couldn't agree more. There really is no reason to blog at all, in my opinion, unless a person is doing it for themselves first and to be true to themselves.

     
    Mark David said:

    @pilgrimchick: Thanks for your comments. I guess what matters is that you realized what's really in your heart. It's a sad fact that we're always going to have disagreements with other people, but it's how we deal with it that probably counts :)

    @Carl V.: Thanks! I've just posted my review of The Historian. I hope to do better on next year's challenge :)

     

Follow

Other Readings

Absorbed in Words • Copyright © 2009 Mark David Gan